Regards to my definition of a promotor:
- not only let others hear Remnote but show 3-5 key shinny points of Remnote
- a promotor should be able to answer the question from a potential Remnote user, and the answer to them should also be customized
- as much more contribution from promotor, there should have better courage rules for them
I believe the official group does have lots of thoughts on how to use remnote for research, writing, and related staff. However, the community is still in the Nascent stage. Though the versatility and potential of remnote attract many remnote users, it’s still unclear how they (include me) can incorporate this system.
So, maybe a roadmap for becoming a master of slip-box or zettlkasten or something like this? A carefully curated knowledge database on effective usage of remnote, the principle of spaced repetition, etc.
On the other hand, a promotor should be couraged in more ways, not only by increasing the number of registers directly, but also great video or blog on remnote they made (concerning number of views? or thumbs-up?)
As for the second question, the answer is yes, since you guys know the potential best. This document will help both the promotor and other remnote users to clear their thought on how to implement remnote in their workflow.
These are my personal opinions. I hope it’s helpful.
BTW, the Chinese remnote community is growing very fast. Please consider better support for Chinese in remnote, especially keyboard input and searching