Third party Image Hosting Option

Pros

  • Users can save their image in their own s3 bucket (or Webdav sever)
  • No need to hard download all the images from the server to local. That means users can save time for Importing from JSON Raw files.
  • Users don’t have to save the image and save SSD storage.
  • Users don’t have to worry about image index loss syncing between server and local. That means there’s no need to force sync anymore.
  • Team can save server cost.
  • Users can bunch import images from s3 client extremely easily.

Cons

  • Users have to learn s3 related experience.
  • It would be Cumbersome for Teams to make the feature

Typora’s image handling is a great example.

I know this is not a priority at the moment, but someday I hope this feature could be achieved.

Would it be more accurate to say you want a self-hosting option, as it is already possible to insert links to e.g. Imgur?

Yes, I know the free hosting service but that is not the point.
I mean a automated option like this

2 Likes